Skip to main content

Radiohead: The start of a trend of free music?



Radiohead's new album will be released in Oct 10 - In Rainbows.

This is not the only thing that will excite Radiohead's fans out there.

The most surprising about In Rainbows is not only its release but its price.

How much it is? - It is whatever you want to pay for it.

Yes, can you believe it? Now, downloading music without paying for it is LEGAL! Haha, only for Radiohead's that is. Radiohead is considered the best band around and if they are doing this - avoiding the whole business model and all - they could be starting a dangerous (but good for us!) trend. People could download good.. no... great music without paying. So why should they pay for substandard music anymore?

Even iTunes charge of 0.99 cents is being threatened. Why pay 0.99 cents when you can get music from the best band around, free?

But one problem here is that they may not have profits at all. So how are they going to continue making music if they do not have the funds to sustain their expenses?

My friend Ling says that it's a good idea, and she's all for it. She's very sure that some rich kids will donate in huge amounts to the band and they could actually make profits out of that.

I seriously doubt it will pull through though. It's already tough making money, what more hoping to get money. If they don't think about profits I don't think they'll get much out of this strategy.

Even the way of checking out their album is a surefire way of how to NOT make money.

Drop In Rainbows' 15 songs into the online checkout basket and a question mark pops up where the price would normally be. Click it, and the prompt "It's Up To You" appears. Click again and it refreshes with the words "It's Really Up To You" — and really, it is. It's the first major album whose price is determined by what individual consumers want to pay for it. And it's perfectly acceptable to pay nothing at all.

Imagine I'm feeling rich (or generous) one day and decided to buy the album for a certain amount of money, let's say 10 bucks. Then I click the buy button and am prepared to check the album out. Then I see "It's Really Up To You". I'll be like,"Wtf, stop wasting my time. You don't want the money right? Then I'll keep it. Muahaha".

Then I decide not to buy it at all. But just download it free. Haha.

Wasted.

Anyways, Radiohead is a great band and I hope there will be people out there paying for their music.

But I wouldn't mind if other bands follow suit though. Then the day of free music download being legalized may finally come true.

Won't that be awesome! :)

Read the full article here: Radiohead says: pay what you want

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tips to a Successful Blog Shop

Recently, or maybe not that recent, I've noticed that there has been an influx of blogshops. For the unsure, blogshops are just like any other shop, selling just about anything, just that it is set up online. Being an avid shopper, as well as one who spends time on the internet often, I have seen myself succumb to buying from blogshops. Many a time, my purchases are sweeeeet! I've not met any dead sellers or had any trouble with getting my items. But don't get me wrong... I still shop at retail shops. In fact, I love both :) Blog shops are fun to scroll through when I just don't have the time to step out (when exams are round the corner). Apart from being a buyer from online shops, I have also tried selling stuff by setting up my own blog shop. It didn't go so well though. Naturally, I prefer buying to selling stuff. Those who buy from blogshops, you may think that it is easy work, but it is a hell lot of work for the sellers. They have to choose the supplies from ...
15 comments
Read more

Do you like Shark's Fin Soup?

There has always been talks about how fishermen leverage on the huge market for the consumption of sharks' fins and throw the dying shark back to the water after snipping off their fins, aka "live-finning". In JC, I've even watched a documentary endorsed by our very own Stephanie Sun (Sun Yan Zi) about the harm that this is causing on those sharks and other marine life. All these news left me a bit apprehensive and I even swore to lay off shark's fin. However, a few years ago, I remember hearing from my mum, after she had read an article on the Straits Times that we can eat shark's fin without guilt . An excerpt below: However, these sensational pictures obscure the fact that many within the industry are against such practices. The vast majority of fins in the market are taken from sharks after their death. This is the preliminary finding of a review made with the assistance of shark experts, fishermen, captains of big fishi...
5 comments
Read more

Some advertisements which do not make a lot of sense

These are real life examples in Singapore. Of cos, some people may beg to differ, but nonetheless, just some opinions of mine so that others can probably create better and more sensible ads =) P.S. This is of no offense to any of the sponsors/companies/advertising agencies or anyone who created the ads below. L'Oreal UV perfect This is how the overall ad looks like in a female magazine Notice this part of the ad. The copy says "30 years old without UV care" for the left one and the one on the right says "30 years old with UV care" You probably can't see if from the pic, but they did use DI to create a difference. Yea, I know that most (or can I say all?) ads use digital imaging, but do you have to make it so obvious? By using the same person and depending on DI to convince consumers, I don't think it really works. In fact... the ad probably will look better without this section. Kellogg's - Special K Saw this ad at the bus stop. So what does this m...
4 comments
Read more